Oh, Okay, Jazak Allah for informing me that but while you are clarifying the models that contained those airbags the dude was not. Moreover, he was talking about a 2020 model that is why checked the brochure and found that he was spreading incorrect information it is not nice thing to do.

Altis 1.8 in 11th gen Corolla used to have only 1 airbag but after 2017 they added more.. similarly before 2017 even Altis 1.6 didn’t have a single airbag but was added in later models

Bhai Usman I am not defending their current price, I am merely enumerating about their product’s durability and reliability supported by my own experience. Since Changan is missing it and to me these features do not matter therefore, I am not going to try it and risk my money, I am going to stay with my Suzuki.
Moreover, I have already stated that people in their hate for a product tend to exaggerate things, the person should have condemned price rather than durability of Suzuki. A couple of days ago one person was stating that Corolla Altis has only one airbag. I checked the brochure, his statement was nullified. But I was shocked, criticism is okay but lying about a product, is it ethical? How can we expect from our brothers not to lie when we ourselves do it all the time? Since you are a professional, I trust your judgement therefore, I hope that you at-least can know what my thoughts are.

Suzuki is reliable no doubt… and that’s exactly why they are able to survive. But they are heavily criticized for being outrageously overpriced, obsolete, short of equipment and for poor quality control… otherwise in regional markets Suzuki is doing relatively well even with the new breed of cars. However in developed markets its a different story altogether.

Well, Suzuki Jimny is popular in Europe it has been phased out of the market recently because it failed to comply with emission standards. If it were not reliable or durable, it would not have been popular. Moreover, Thailand and Japan are developed countries, Suzuki is doing well over there.
Furthermore, I am using Suzuki Cultus 2017 old shape and after four years of fairly rough use, it has not cost me other than regular oil change. Is it not reliability? Sure the plastic is cheap however, it has not faded yet, its ability of retaining its original state is defining the durability and reliability that I expect from the car. Lastly, are you aware that Chinese corporations have formed joint ventures with Suzuki? Why the case if your words about Suzuki being pathetic are to be believed?
Since both of us know the word durability and reliability in different form therefore, I disagree about Suzuki being non-reliable.

As far as reliability and quality is concerned, Suzuki cars are pathetic in this category all around the global major automotive markets. You won’t find any decent number of suzuki cars in markets like US, Europe, Gulf and China. Cheap suzuki junk is generally popular among under developed and poorer countries around the world. But yeah Toyota is totally in another league altogether and have a great market share globally under both of its Toyota and Lexus brands and are famous for reliability and retaining reasonable resale value too.
There are many Chinese manufacturers which are competing in global automotive industry and perform better than suzukis

I knew, someone was going to say that. The engine has yet to survive in Pakistan and if I am correct, than suspension also matters to a car buyer so unless Changan is able to operate for ten or fifteen years at a similar maintenance cost and frequency of maintenance as a Toyota or Suzuki vehicles do in Pakistan. I am not going to be buying it. Also, why do you care whatever others feel? Please buy the crap Changhan, use it and state about your experience maybe then you will have something solid to prove about its durability.