Khurram is like a breath of stale air.

😁

You ludicrous man, you were supposed to ask commercial transporters whether or not they shouted at the decision and whether or not P.S. for a short time discontinued both cars.
I wonder once again in your haste to insult me you chose to present to us what a limited view keeping person you are. No worries, better luck next time.

https://carspiritpk.com/pak-suzuki-to-finally-say-goodbye-to-ravi-bolan/

https://propakistani.pk/2021/08/13/suzuki-to-finally-discontinue-bolan-ravi/

extract from the CSP article:

“According to a report published by Samaa, the move comes as Lahore High Court has directed the Engineering Development Board (EDB), which is the regulatory agency for the auto industry, to make it mandatory for automakers to assemble cars with airbags. Technically it is not possible to fit airbags in Ravi & Bolan so the company will replace it with the Suzuki Every model, which is in fact a newer generation of Suzuki Carry.”

LHC did not order any ban or stoppage of the vehicles. It just ordered the assembler to add airbags. since the ravi and bolan predate airbags by decades… they cannot be fitted with them thus it seems they will have to be replaced. It is just a case of old outdate technology getting in the way of progress.

Then again, a Luddite like you will not understand that.

Sadly, he didn’t go quiet… rather he completely threw his point away out of the window and tried to teach him the definition of a “riot”, completely contradicting himself in the meantime, also while calling him a lesser person than himself like usual.

Never change, Khurram 🤣

Actually YES, I did see a riot near my general store and pan shop when exactly one person came and complained about them not having parts for his Corolla XLI and Bolan readily available. I wonder who it was. 🤔

Sorry for the confusion.

I was talking about his claim that wearing or not wearing a seatbelt will affect the fuel consumption of cars. The link I gave was to the first time I came across him making that gem of a claim.

Your point is very valid. And as Troung pointed out he makes wild baseless claims and ridicules people who prove him wrong even when they do it with evidence. In instances like this (you asking him a very valid question), he just goes quiet.

Apologies for the late reply.

So, you are another man whose views are limited, well, I don’t need to justify what I said but let me impress on you the full meaning of a riot. It also includes an uproar and the word means expression of a verbal outrage and it could be presented in a mere verbal form by circulating a post on a social media or a print media.
Kindly research on the words meaning before posting a gibberish on a public forum and making a mess out of small matter that is not even effecting you. Besides, did you ask it from a commercial vehicle buyer? I suggest instead of mincing words and acting ludicrously you would do well to ask from a commercial transporter.

No Ali Khan, I wasn’t talking about this one. Maybe the link is taking you somewhere else. I’d quote his text here: “The article is not reflecting part of the ground reality, L.H.C. ordered Pak Suzuki to stop assembling the vehicle, however, actual vehicle users rioted and questioned would L.H.C. then bear high costs of repair?”

Did you see any riots? Were they covered in any news? Do you think LHC would take it easily when people are rioting in perfect insolence against it? Do you think random customers of some vehicle stand any chance (except judicially allowed methods such as appeal in higher court) against an institution of such authority?

Are you a Bolan or Ravi user? Do most of these commercial users at-least have time to answer your question or write and article? Moreover, to verify my claim, why don’t you get in touch with people actually buying these vehicles? In this way you or that Mr Truong won’t have to take my baseless word and would rather know whether or not they rioted or requested the company.
By the way, bhai Usman is a professional, I am sure he does not have time to ferret out an issue that just surfaced and ended in mere hours. I know about it because the day the L.H.C. issued the order, I booked Cultus online and I saw that Bolan was not listed then. What then did that mean? To me at-least it seemed that the company has stopped offering the product. Now however, both versions of Bolan are visible on the website and even their updated prices are listed along-with brochures. Moreover, my cousin who has connections in a press, about three to four weeks, also told me that the transporters are angry at this decision and have criticised it.
P.S. I am curios, why have you questioned my claim only? Why not ask Mr. Truong claiming that Bolan and Ravi does not even has a seatbelt, when in reality and as per brochure they both have it. The truth I believe is that you all are private car users and have never really used the Bolan the way it is meant to be and therefore, are neither aware about its true worth, nor you care about your words biting actual users of the car.

WOW… How could’ve we missed this one?? and the fact that he claimed this one AGAIN a second time… 😂😂